Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8 Lens Review (with Canon EOS)
I recently wrote about an adapter I bought for my 5D which allowed me to mount my old Olympus OM Zuiko lenses on it. In that post, I provided a couple of samples with a normal range 55mm f/1.2. Here’s a quick update with a longer lens – the Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8, with a particular emphasis with how it performs with a Canon 5D Mark II.
I’m a big fan of the old Olympus Zuiko lenses which have a few interesting characteristics:
- They are very compact
- They can be cheap second hand (compared to many other brands e.g. Leica, modern lenses, etc)
- They have great out of focus characteristics (with beautiful, creamy Bokeh)
- Many have very close minimum focusing distance
- Optically, they’ve very impressive
I’ll give a quick overview of each of these characteristics with respect to the 135mm f/2.8
Compact / Size
The 135mm f/2.8 measures a relatively small 3,2″ (80mm) max length x 2.4″ (61mm) max diameter. Given it’s all metal / glass construction it weighs 0.8lbs (360g) which while light, is enough to make it feel solid and hefty for its size. A clever feature is that it contains a built in hood which can slide out / retract easily whenever you need it. The shape of the lens itself is cylindrical and doesn’t enlarge as you move away from the base towards the lens. This makes it very portable – I am often able to carry it in a jacket pocket for example without much fuss.
To provide some perspective, the faster AF Canon L 135mm f2 is approx 112 mm (4.4 inches) max length x 83mm (3.2 inches) max width. Weight is 1.7lbs (750 grams). While these dimensions reflect some of the difference, in the real world, it’s even greater. Pointing the Canon 135mm L at people in the street (particularly when the hood is attached) is an easy way to get noticed. Although not entirely inconspicuous, the Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8 is not as obvious.
One downside here is that while the build quality of the lens is superb, on my Zuiko -> EOS mount, it doesn’t feel as rigid or secure as some other lenses. I suspect it’s my adapter at fault here. While it doesn’t affect anything in terms of image quality / safety / performance, it is noticeable. My only other criticism is that when mounted to a 5D, it looks… well, kinda ugly.
Price
I love this – I bought my Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8 lens for $99 on ebay for a buy it now. I’d consider the quality to be somewhere between Excellent and Mint. There aren’t hundreds for sale on ebay but wait and a while and it’s pretty easy to pick one up. In contrast, the superb Canon 135mm f/2 L goes for a grand on Amazon (and this is the best value L lens). Alternatively a Canon 135mm f/2.8 with soft focus will still set you back nearly $500.
Bokeh
The bokeh of the Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8, like many Zuiko’s, is gorgeous. When there are elements of the image that are very out-of-focus, it takes on that swirly effect – but it’s not as apparent as in some of the shorter focal lengths. Here’s a shot when mounted onto a Olympus OM-1 film camera which illustrates that effect:
Olympus OM-1 + Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8 on Fujifilm Neopan 100 Acros
With more typical scenes, it’s what you’d expect from a high quality lens – a beautiful, smooth, drop off in depth of field which gives pleasing subject isolation. It’s not as a dramatic effect as with an F2 at this focal length, but it still looks great. Here’s a shot from this afternoon that illustrates this:
Canon 5D Mark II + Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8
Minimum Focusing Distance
A lot of the Zuiko’s have impressive minimum focusing distances. Not so with the 135mm f/2.8 which actually has a fairly long min focusing distance of 1.5m (nearly 5 feet). What does this mean in real terms? Well, head shot portraits are fine but you can’t get a lot closer and you certainly don’t get any macro effect. Here’s an example of what a min focusing distance gets you with a portrait (shot on a Olympus OM-4 film camera):
Olympus OM-4 + Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8 on Kodak Ektar 100
Optics
I’ll be honest, I wasn’t expecting that much when I bought this lens originally. I just figured I’d get something cheap, fairly portable and would be useful in a pinch for the film work I’ve been doing. However, after shooting with it for a while, this little telephoto is turning out to be quite a performer with excellent sharpness, great colour and as I mentioned already, wonderful out of focus characteristics. For resolution freaks, here’s a couple of examples with 100% crops which show the resolving power when mounted to a Canon 5D Mark II:
Canon 5D Mark II + Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8 (original image)
Canon 5D Mark II + Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8 (100% crop)
If you click on the 100% crop, you’ll see what is actually extremely impressive sharpness at the center. I will add that this was shot wide open at f2.8 and I’ve done no photoshop to the original or cropped image – it was already way sharp enough. Pretty cool. You can see a little vignetting but nothing particularly concerning.
Now, if staring at lines one pixel in width doesn’t do it for you – here’s a shot of the same scene but taken at a time and with lighting that actually produces a real image:
This version was taken at 7am on a beautiful morning. Shot with an Olympus OM-4 + Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8 on Fujichrome Velvia 100
Coming back to pixel peeping for a moment, here’s another example:
Canon 5D Mark II + Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8 (original image)
Canon 5D Mark II + Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8 (100% crop)
This one I’ve applied a minor unsharp mask to. It suffers a little from relying on my manual focusing skills which can be subject to minor misses once in a while. Again though – looks v good.
If 100% crops doesn’t get you going, here are a few real images. I shot these this afternoon in the space of an hour or so while wandering around. Again, all when mounted to a Canon 5D Mark II:
Canon 5D Mark II + Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8
Canon 5D Mark II + Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8
Canon 5D Mark II + Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8
Canon 5D Mark II + Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f/2.8
Verdict
I normally don’t get too excited about a lens with a maximum aperture smaller than f2, but this little old telephoto has definitely impressed me. After all – what’s not to like. Lets summarise… It’s a small compact telephoto that produces ultra sharp images with beautiful out of focus and a max aperture of f/2.8. It can be used on the legendary Olympus OM line or mounted to Canon’s EOS sytem for a cheap adapter available on ebay. An excellent to mint copy costs a hundred bucks (cheaper than the cheapest plastic lens Canon makes or about the same as a month of latte’s).
Again, seriously, what’s not to like.












(4 votes, average: 4.75 out of 5)
Beautiful pictures. I just came across your blog and wanted to drop you a note telling you how impressed I was with the information you have posted here.
I’ve been interested in trying out some of the older manual lenses but I’ve always been daunted by the fact that I just have a really hard time focusing sharp with the viewfinder on my 50D. I know you can mod the camera with different mirrors but…I’d really rather not.
For many of the shots, are you simply using manual focus through the eye piece? Or are you using live view? I guess with plenty of practice I’m sure I can get to the point of getting pretty good with the focusing through the eye piece but I do miss the old SLR split circle focus assist that no one makes for the new cameras anymore :(
Lawrence, another extraordinary post proving that less really can be more in today’s over-saturated equipment market.
Nice review, although I sort of prefer that the old OM lenses remain a secret among film folks. If all the digital people start buying them then the prices will go up, and then I will NEVER be able to find my affordable OM 50/1.2.
Hi Tim – for my shots, I’m just focusing through the 5D eye piece. The size of the 5D viewfinder definitely helps compared to some cropped sensors, but for some reason I’ve never had trouble focusing with the 5D. I believe it is possible to change the focusing screen on the 5D for a split screen which would make it easier, although I suspect you may lose spot focusing if that’s the case (which I don’t use much on the 5D anyway). If I get one, I’ll definitely post thoughts on here.
Fred – thanks v much for the kind words.
Mel – it’s v true that OM glass has been a well kept secret. I overcome the dilemma by only posting write ups of lenses I’ve already bought :).
some D-SLRs do have 3rd party focusing screens for MF
So far I found that KatzEye and BrightScreen make them.
You can have the old split circle or/and microprism as well :)
Ranma – if you have experience with either of these brands on a Canon body, would love to hear your thoughts.
I plan to go D-SLR & get a Nikon D700, and use old Nikkor AI 50mm f/1.4 Manual Focus lens I’ve been using.
I look around the web & found those, just to make sure I can use the lens & focus properly with D700.
I plan to get the BrightScreen with the same screen as Nikon F3 :)
I have exactly the same experience. I was nicely surprised when I looked at the distant objects thru this lens first time, how sharp and visible they were. This is really good lens with very nice color rendition.
Thanks for another fine review. I currently use OM glass including the 135/2.8 on both an OM-2n and E-410 on which it becomes an effective 270/2.8 (with some focussing difficulty if not using live view). Your review has convinced me to purchase a 5D body for digital work.
Or should I save for the 5Dmk2?
[...] 8How about an OM lens review? Lawrence Ripsher has published a review of the Olympus OM 135mm f2.8 mounted on a Canon DSLR – the 5DMk2! Read on to find out what he found out and why he chose [...]
The size of the 5D viewfinder definitely helps compared to some cropped sensors, but for some reason I’ve never had trouble focusing with the 5D.
hi Lawrence
thanks for the great review. Can you recommend a good adapter for the lens on a EOS body? You mentioned that your adapter wasn’t really as good. any ideas on what would be a good one?
thanks a million!
Ray
I’ve never had trouble focusing with the 5D.
Just got a 5dMk2 couple days ago and revived my 30 year old OM Zuikos via Fotodiox adaptors. 50mm 3.5 macro, 50mm 1.8, 80mm 2.0 and 35mm2.0. I can’t say enough how beautifully those lenses all perform on this EOS body. Who needs a/f when you can use hyperfocal distance and a little planning ahead?
Cheers.
Leave your response!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Stay Connected
Tags
Twitter Feed
Recent Comments
Archives
Admin
Best of the Best
Most Commented