Comments on: Panasonic LX3 Review – Image Quality (Part 3)

By: mortgage loans

mortgage loans — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 05:07:43 +0000

The loans are useful for guys, which are willing to organize their organization. In fact, that’s not hard to receive a consolidation loan.

By: Jon

Jon — Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:12:19 +0000

Great review, very well written and presented. I enjoyed the fact that you focus on real world experiences and results, rather than pixel peeping and jargon.

I now own an LX3, largely thanks to your review and I am extremely happy with it.

Thanks again.

By: r4 dsi

r4 dsi — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:25:14 +0000

Love this post. Beautiful pictures. Beautiful review. I am planning to buy this camera on this Christmas.

By: Alan Carr

Alan Carr — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:04:00 +0000

I actually came here looking for info' on how well it performas with an external flash on that lovely hotshoe.

I'll comment though if only to offer my sympathy for all the "aw, cute doggies!" comments rather than commenting on the actual review. Feeling for ya dude!

Alan

By: Pete

Pete — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:11:31 +0000

I refer to Steves comment above about the Fuji 100fs - It has problems with chromatic aberation + other minor niggles

I like the LX3 very much
Got a good price from Mathers of Lancashire (Bolton UK) who are phoning me when they have one in stock.

Excellent review - Its what made me pick the LX3 Thanks very much
Pete

By: sls

sls — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:49:59 +0000

Thank you for the in depth and useful knowledge. I just went to Singapore on my honeymoon and looking at your images brought back memories...

By: nabby

nabby — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:14:58 +0000

Thanks for the great review. Hmm… tempting. I'm still nursing a Canon 10D, but I've borrowed friends' 5D bodies many times to use with my 35/1.4, 85/1.8 and 135/2, and it was absolute heaven. But I find that I often don't want to lug around a SLR kit, while at the same time being a dog owner now (love it!) I often want a camera by my side. I was going to save for a used 5D, but maybe something like the LX3 could hold me over for another couple years… at a certain point it becomes more about capturing the image rather than absolute quality. And that 24mm f/2 lens makes it far more palatable than other digicams…

By: Ivor

Ivor — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:05:48 +0000

Too many people get carried away with pixel count and the manufacturers are forced to compete with each other over this. Basically a high pixel count in a small sensor is a recipe for disaster. The Fuji F30 is a great camera for low light use because it only has six million pixels and the pixels are larger and more sensitive to light. A 12mp camera with the same sensor size is going to have much smaller pixels which are less sensitive to light resulting in more noise at higher ISO. What Fuji should have done with the F30 is to keep the pixel count the same and increase the sensor size, improve the lens, introduce more manual options and add image stabilisation and it would have been better camera than any compact camera currently on the market. The Panasonic LX3 has smaller pixels than the Fuji and can never be as good in low light.

By: Barbara

Barbara — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:39:01 +0000

I am a novice, looking for a general all around camera that I can also use for shooting my artwork. The LX3 interests me in many regards, esp wide angle, but I wonder if the white balance would be a problem. Your thoughts and any other suggestions. Thanks.

By: Shafik

Shafik — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 07:34:44 +0000

I enjoyed this review very much. Wonderful pictures also…. I'm gonna buy this camera in the next hour!