﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic LX3 Review &#8211; Conclusion (Part 4)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html</link>
	<description>Photos, Reviews, Instruction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:11:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jailen</title>
		<link>http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-8181</link>
		<dc:creator>Jailen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 03:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrenceripsher.com/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html#comment-8181</guid>
		<description>At last! Someone who understands! Thanks for potsnig!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last! Someone who understands! Thanks for potsnig!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsi r4</title>
		<link>http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-3308</link>
		<dc:creator>dsi r4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrenceripsher.com/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html#comment-3308</guid>
		<description>This camera was a delightful surprise. It is small and easy to use, yet takes beautiful pictures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This camera was a delightful surprise. It is small and easy to use, yet takes beautiful pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arkin</title>
		<link>http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Arkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 08:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrenceripsher.com/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html#comment-569</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would buy this camera but I&#039;m not sure that this is the right one , I hear that LX 3  run out of battery so fast anyone can confirm that it true or not? , my another choice is Ricoh GX200 , the price almost same not more than 20,000 Thai baht (not including accessories)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bangkok &lt;br /&gt;
Thailand&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would buy this camera but I&#39;m not sure that this is the right one , I hear that LX 3  run out of battery so fast anyone can confirm that it true or not? , my another choice is Ricoh GX200 , the price almost same not more than 20,000 Thai baht (not including accessories)</p>
<p>Bangkok <br />
Thailand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoch Gabbay</title>
		<link>http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoch Gabbay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrenceripsher.com/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html#comment-568</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A question: does your LX3 record more than 10 continuous minutes of video?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The European model is crippled and will not.  I am very curious to know if a model bought in Japan, the US, or Asia will record more than 10 continuous minutes of video.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question: does your LX3 record more than 10 continuous minutes of video?</p>
<p>The European model is crippled and will not.  I am very curious to know if a model bought in Japan, the US, or Asia will record more than 10 continuous minutes of video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 01:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrenceripsher.com/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html#comment-567</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this very good review.&lt;br /&gt;
I am very tempted by this camera, I also have an eye on the Ricoh GR Digital II, I know the Ricoh doesn&#039;t have a zoom lens, but my main concern is to shoot in wide angle.&lt;br /&gt;
Do you have any tips on helping me which one to choose, ignoring the zoom lens factor.&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks in advance,&lt;br /&gt;
Pierre&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this very good review.<br />
I am very tempted by this camera, I also have an eye on the Ricoh GR Digital II, I know the Ricoh doesn&#39;t have a zoom lens, but my main concern is to shoot in wide angle.<br />
Do you have any tips on helping me which one to choose, ignoring the zoom lens factor.<br />
Thanks in advance,<br />
Pierre</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davasse</title>
		<link>http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>davasse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrenceripsher.com/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html#comment-566</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;An excellent, very straight forward review, Thanks a lot. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent, very straight forward review, Thanks a lot. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrenceripsher.com/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html#comment-565</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It is a great camera. Very nice picture quality and fast. I would like to see an addition of a threaded filter right on the lens rim. The one that is provided makes the camera too large and defeats the purpose/term compact.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a great camera. Very nice picture quality and fast. I would like to see an addition of a threaded filter right on the lens rim. The one that is provided makes the camera too large and defeats the purpose/term compact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Franiec</title>
		<link>http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Franiec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrenceripsher.com/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html#comment-564</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice and balanced review, Larry.&lt;br /&gt;
I wish you best of luck in growing your very interesting web site for the benefit of LX3/DLux4 users.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here is my contribution to improve LX3 ergonomics and friendliness of user interface: &lt;a href=&quot;http://kleptography.com/rf/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://kleptography.com/rf/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Richard&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice and balanced review, Larry.<br />
I wish you best of luck in growing your very interesting web site for the benefit of LX3/DLux4 users.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p>Here is my contribution to improve LX3 ergonomics and friendliness of user interface: <a  href="http://kleptography.com/rf/" rel="nofollow">http://kleptography.com/rf/</a></p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrenceripsher.com/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html#comment-563</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the great review! I&#039;m also curious about a comparison against the G10... any thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great review! I&#39;m also curious about a comparison against the G10&#8230; any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Des Kinsman</title>
		<link>http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Des Kinsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrenceripsher.com/2008/08/panasonic-lx3-review-conclusion-part-4.html#comment-562</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for an excellent and sensible review of the LX3. You have made me finally make up my mind which Lumix I must have.&lt;br /&gt;
One big problem with short focal length lenses is the depth of field, having a F2.0 aperture helps a little to eliminate this weakness. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for an excellent and sensible review of the LX3. You have made me finally make up my mind which Lumix I must have.<br />
One big problem with short focal length lenses is the depth of field, having a F2.0 aperture helps a little to eliminate this weakness. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

