﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon G9 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2007/11/canon-g9-revi-5.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2007/11/canon-g9-revi-5.html</link>
	<description>Photos, Reviews, Instruction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:11:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Murphy</title>
		<link>http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2007/11/canon-g9-revi-5.html/comment-page-1#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrenceripsher.com/2007/11/canon-g9-revi-5.html#comment-423</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the great write-up.  I can&#039;t decide between the G9 and the Ricoh GX100, and unfortunately I&#039;m no closer!  I&#039;m leaning towards the Ricoh for its 24-72mm zoom range, but I am bit worried about wanting something longer sometimes!  Of course, the only thing holding me back from the Canon is it&#039;s short end!  I don&#039;t really need 24mm, a 28-135 or even 105 would be fine.  I&#039;m sure eventually one of them will get it right!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great write-up.  I can&#39;t decide between the G9 and the Ricoh GX100, and unfortunately I&#39;m no closer!  I&#39;m leaning towards the Ricoh for its 24-72mm zoom range, but I am bit worried about wanting something longer sometimes!  Of course, the only thing holding me back from the Canon is it&#39;s short end!  I don&#39;t really need 24mm, a 28-135 or even 105 would be fine.  I&#39;m sure eventually one of them will get it right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

