Comments on: Canon 40D Review – Part 5 (Conclusion) http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2007/11/canon-40d-revie.html Photos, Reviews, Instruction Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:11:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: Anonymous http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2007/11/canon-40d-revie.html/comment-page-1#comment-459 Anonymous Sun, 11 Oct 2009 11:41:37 +0000 http://lawrenceripsher.com/2007/11/canon-40d-revie.html#comment-459 <p>Great review. Easy to read and great information. I like the personal touch you add and it's easy reading. I do wedding photography and I've found 40D's at spectacular prices on the web. I'm thinking of buying two of them and a couple of 580EX-II's. </p> Great review. Easy to read and great information. I like the personal touch you add and it's easy reading. I do wedding photography and I've found 40D's at spectacular prices on the web. I'm thinking of buying two of them and a couple of 580EX-II's.

]]> By: scared http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2007/11/canon-40d-revie.html/comment-page-1#comment-458 scared Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:46:51 +0000 http://lawrenceripsher.com/2007/11/canon-40d-revie.html#comment-458 <p>"Many people have described this as the 1D MK3’s little brother (sans the AF problems which are now thankfully being resolved)"</p> <p>Not true. Only may be.<br /> Wait and see.</p> <p>cheers</p> "Many people have described this as the 1D MK3’s little brother (sans the AF problems which are now thankfully being resolved)"

Not true. Only may be.
Wait and see.

cheers

]]> By: scared http://lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2007/11/canon-40d-revie.html/comment-page-1#comment-457 scared Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:45:55 +0000 http://lawrenceripsher.com/2007/11/canon-40d-revie.html#comment-457 <p>"Many people have described this as the 1D MK3’s little brother (sans the AF problems which are now thankfully being resolved)"</p> <p>Not true. Only may be.<br /> Wait and see.</p> <p>cheers</p> "Many people have described this as the 1D MK3’s little brother (sans the AF problems which are now thankfully being resolved)"

Not true. Only may be.
Wait and see.

cheers

]]>